 When Nigeria’s former military president Ibrahim Babangida was forced to ‘step  aside’ in 1993 after eight years in office, he retired to his palatial hilltop  mansion in Minna. He left office as one of the most unpopular personalities in  the country. Similarly, when former president Olusegun Obasanjo left office  after eight years in 2007, he retired to another hilltop palace in Abeokuta,  also highly unpopular. By contrast, when Brazil’s former president Luiz Inacio  Lula da Silva or “Lula” left office after eight years with approval ratings of  80 percent, he retired to a nondescript apartment.
When Nigeria’s former military president Ibrahim Babangida was forced to ‘step  aside’ in 1993 after eight years in office, he retired to his palatial hilltop  mansion in Minna. He left office as one of the most unpopular personalities in  the country. Similarly, when former president Olusegun Obasanjo left office  after eight years in 2007, he retired to another hilltop palace in Abeokuta,  also highly unpopular. By contrast, when Brazil’s former president Luiz Inacio  Lula da Silva or “Lula” left office after eight years with approval ratings of  80 percent, he retired to a nondescript apartment. At the time Babangida  left office, the country was in serious political and economic turmoil after the  longest political transition anywhere in the world. It is true that his  administration initiated some positive reforms, but the toga of corruption that  hung over his government left a shadow of doubt about the efficacy and  sustainability of some of those reforms. Whatever vestige of a legacy he had  left was eroded by his annulment of the June 12, 1993 presidential  elections.
Similarly, credit (if grudgingly) must be given to some of the  initiatives of the Obasanjo administration. However, the massive corruption that  also characterized his administration and failure to improve infrastructure,  particularly roads and power left serious credibility gaps. The major undoing of  Obasanjo, as with Babangida, was his desire to hang on to power at all cost. And  like Babangida before him, history will not judge them by what little they  achieved, but by their failed bids to remain in power against popular sentiment  and the damage they both inflicted on our democracy. At least, they both have  their huge hilltop (if largely empty) mansions to console them.
Compare  these two leaders to Brazil’s Lula and one can only reiterate what Chinua Achebe  said: Nigeria’s problem is that of leadership. Before Lula became president,  Brazil was known for its world-class footballers, beautiful beaches and as the  biggest debtor nation in the world. Beneath these facts also lay the truth that  the country had one of the widest economic apartheids in the world: less than  five percent of the country’s elite owned or controlled over 95 percent of  Brazil’s wealth.
Incidentally, Nigeria and Brazil share certain  similarities. (Brazil and Nigeria were joined before being torn apart by  primordial geologic forces). Brazil has the largest population in South America  while Nigeria has the largest population in Africa; both estimated to hit 200  million soon. Both countries suffered military intervention in politics. Both  countries also have cultural and ethnic diversities and with huge swathes of the  population living in poverty. Then God gave Brazil Lula. Or put another way,  they discarded primeval instincts and elected a patriot.
Lula created  many highly successful anti-poverty programs, such as Bolsa Família (Family  Allowance) and Fome Zero (Zero Hunger). Financial aid was given to more than 12  million poor Brazilian families on condition that their children attend school  and get vaccinated. This has become the largest conditional cash transfer  program in the world, and has reduced poverty in Brazil by more than 27%. Lula  has transformed Brazil from one of the world’s largest foreign debtor nations to  a net creditor.
Brazil is set to overtake France and the United Kingdom  as the world’s fifth-largest economy as early as 2025. And with Rio de Janeiro  having won the right to host the football World Cup in 2014 and the Olympics in  2016, more development will take place. With transparent leadership, Brazil is  firing on all cylinders and is currently one of the fastest growing economies in  the world. And that is just the beginning for a country that has vast tourism  and industrial potential. The economy is not dependent on crude oil alone.  Embraer (ERJ) is Brazilian company and is now the world’s third-largest  manufacturer of passenger jets after Boeing and Airbus.
Once the most  debt-ridden country in the world, Brazil’s fiscal budget is now in surplus- she  is a net creditor. Brazil boasts large-trade surpluses and foreign reserves of  about $300 billion. Brazil today is the world’s largest exporter of coffee,  sugar, chicken, beef and orange juice. In recent years, the country has become  the second-biggest destination for foreign direct investment into developing  countries after China.
The message is simple: as the elections approach,  we must elect the candidate that is closest to Lula in terms of honesty,  patriotism and simplicity. Religion and ethnicity must not befuddle our  thinking. One inspired leader can make all the difference. 
 
 
 
I've been living in Brazil for 7yrs and I can testify to all these.
ReplyDelete